Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná.

By: Mauro | June 1st, 2008


Should Fluminense eliminate Boca Juniors in this week’s semi-final it will be the first time in their club’s history that they make it to the final match. Well, given that this year was the first year that Flu made it out of the group stage, as far as they’ve gotten is cause for celebration.

But the club directors have added a little spice to this Wednesday’s match. They have promised the players an extra $190,000 to split amongst themselves should they qualify for the finals of the Copa Libertadores.

And the fact that one squad is from Argentina and one from Brazil, there has been a fair amount of trash talking. Juan Roman Riquelme started right after the match with a not so combative statement about how Flu scored two goals but did not attack very much. I think it was a backhanded way of saying that they did not deserve to draw the match.

Then Thiago Silva added his two cents by saying that Boca’s players talk too much. That Boca’s “players shouldn’t say that they are more men than us.” Basically asking Boca to respect Flu and their chances. I think he might just be tired of hearing the press tell him that they haven’t accomplished anything by having the series even and two goals a piece. Boca can and most likely will come back. That’s not disrespect, that’s a fact.

Carlos Ischia and the players came out to support Pablo Migliore for the goal he gifted to Thiago Neves for Fluminense’s second goal. He said, “My team mates and coach made me understand that I am not to blame for anything.”

Apparently, there was quite the turn out for the opening sales of tickets for Wednesday’s match. Some fans even camped out all night to get a tickets costing between 30 reales (18 dollars) and 100 reales (92 dollars).

Flu need a 0-0 or 1-1 result to advance to the finals. A victory would also deliver them into the finals. Boca need a win by 2 or more goals.

Looks to be a great one coming up. Watch this space for more information. I’ll be uploading a nice preview and then a re-cap of both matches this week.

Be sure to check the CONMEBOL website for any and all information regarding the Copa Libertadores, like stats, results and upcoming matches. It even has a pull down menu where you can check out past editions of the Libertadores.




Category Category: Tournament News

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná. digg:Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná. reddit:Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná. fark:Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná. Y!:Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná. stumbleupon:Spicy 2nd Leg at the Maracaná.

Comments  

  • Seth |  June 3rd, 2008 at 10:43 am

    cornercorner

    Doesn’t Boca only need to win 1-0 to advance?

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Mauro |  June 3rd, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    cornercorner

    Boca needs to cover the away goals they gave up in Buenos Aires last week. A 0-0 or 1-1 draw tomorrow qualifies Flu for the final. Boca need to score at least 3 goals and hold Flu to zero. A 2-2 draw will give them penalties (Ugh!). A 3-3 draw will allow Boca to advance.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Seth |  June 3rd, 2008 at 10:45 pm

    cornercorner

    From my understanding of Copa rules, Boca doesn’t need to cover or match Flu’s away goals (maybe I’m misreading your post). Away goals only matter if the aggregate is level. So, Boca will advance with a one goal victory or a draw if they score at least 3 goals. 2-2 sends it to PKs.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Mauro |  June 4th, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    cornercorner

    Ok, so here’s the story, the away goals rule counts as double in the event of a draw.

    I have always believed that it’s to break a draw. I assumed that the team who is away in the second leg (Boca, in this case) after a draw in the first leg would have to match the goal count they conceded and win by the difference conceded, plus one.

    Now, I’m open to being wrong but I assumed that this was how the law was applied in this case. Anyone else have an opinion about this?

    The best example I can think to explain my perception of the away goal rule is Fluminense’s 3-1 win over Sao Paulo in Rio. They needed to win by two clear goals after having lost 1-0 in Sao Paulo. They had to cover the goal scored against them and score one more to win outright and avoid penalties. But they lost the first leg so that’s not quite the same thing.

    Boca is also in the same position as they were going into the second leg of the Atlas tie. They were 2-2 in the first leg, needing to win by two clear goals. I believe being ahead on the aggregate is not enough to send them through automatically.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Mauro |  June 4th, 2008 at 9:18 pm

    cornercorner

    Actually, I get it now. I was interpreting it incorrectly. With any kind of win Boca does advance because they are up on the aggregate. You were right Seth. A 1-0 win gives them the right to advance.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


World Cup 2010 News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners





Categories


rounded_corners
DID YOU KNOW? Argentina has won the Copa America 1 ...
Price: $39.99

Powered by

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email libertadores[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives